Corporate price hikes get the side-eye as greedflation trends, stoking the inflate debate |
||
More heated than the “Succession” finale… the greedflation debate. With inflation still stubbornly high, some are pointing fingers at corporate profits. The idea, also dubbed profit-led inflation or “excuseflation,” is that some corporations hike prices beyond what’s needed to cover rising costs — leaning on broad inflation and black-swan events (like: pandemic, war) as an excuse. In a recent survey of 2K US consumers, over half said they believe greedflation is happening “a lot.” They’re not alone.
Not everyone’s on team #greedflation… While some margin-padding may be happening, many economists say there’s little evidence that corporate profits are significant contributors to inflation. Last week, former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke and ex-IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard released a study that pointed to Covid supply shocks (and the trillions in gov’t stimulus that followed) as the main causes of US pandemic-era inflation. Picture: fewer goods available + more $$ to buy them with. Last year, Treasury Secretary Yellen rejected the idea that corporate greed is driving inflation, pointing to good-old supply and demand as the main culprit. |
||
|
||
The “greedflation” debate is a symptom… of unusually resilient demand. US consumer spending jumped last month and inflation accelerated. Despite its aggressive interest-rate hikes, the Fed hasn’t been able to cool demand/inflation/the labor market nearly as fast as hoped. Without continued spending, prices wouldn’t have been able to stay so elevated. Resilient demand could be a result of extraordinary stimulus measures and years of near-zero rates that helped lead to historically low unemployment and rising wages. But some retailers are starting to see that consumers are tightening their budgets. |
Next post: How crypto is dealing with debt ceiling turmoil
Previous post: Key Labor Market Reports This Week to Shed Light on Economy